I'll try read about either of those scanners and if I have anything to contribute I'll be back. I don't scan above 3200dpi, sometimes just 2400. I strongly believe the 7200dpi, or the 3900dpi aren't true figures but interpolated or whatever, just like the epsons. I'd like to see how these 2 scanners compare to the Epson flatbeds for 35mm scanning. While the Epson FastFoto FF-680W above is the best all-round photo scanner, if you have the budget and want the very best results, then the Canoscan 9000F Mark II ticks all the right boxes. These things just appear to blow any other scanner out the water (but if you don't like large ugly scanners then this rules anything like that out - so does the price). Personally I'm considering either buying a dedicated Nikon 35mm scanner, or the Nikon Coolscan 9000ED to scan both medium format and 35mm. Should I ever want to scan them at maximum possible resolution to print them really big, I don't think my epson is up to that task (but i haven't tried). With improved scanning settings and good ways at correcting colour and sharpness (as I'm learning from peewee) the scans are progressively getting better, and for showing on the net or flickr are fine.
I use an epson v500 photo scanner, and while I'm happy with the way it does medium format scans, 35mm leaves a little to be desired. I did a flickr search for qpix and got some nice photos back, but you can't tell if that captures all the detail, or the guy just auto-toned it so it looks sharp and crisp. I once used an el cheapo 'dedicated' film scanner and it was a piece of crap. I have no idea about either of those scanners. Would love to hear the outcomes from those who have started similar threads. I want to stay away from a flatbed scanner (unless it appears the only sensible choice) as I have limited desk space (+ I think they are ugly).
#Qpix photo scanner reviews for mac
Mac support (hardware and software) is a must for Mac running Snow Leopard, other than that I am open to any other alternatives and advice.
Here are two examples from both ends of the scale: but I would want to be confident I was getting something of great quality. I would be happy spending $150, however if the advice turns out strongly to spend more, I would considering paying $400. If I am particularly fond of a photo, I will get it printed professionally from the negative.
I want to be able to scan my negatives (home developed) and share them online. I have searched and found plenty of great advice, however I am not so sure what would be best for my situation. I've just started shooting film again (Pentax MZ-50 and Holga 135BC) with the intention of developing my film at home (B&W to start with, then colour). Friends, I enlist your wisdom to help me decide what 35mm film scanner to buy.
0 kommentar(er)
